Choosing field of study or work

This is just an opinion. You can agree or reject after reading and reflecting on the subject.

I believe we must talk to the person in the mirror and recognize our basic skills, abilities and traits.

After recognizing our skill set,  we must see positive and negatives of the field of study or work. 

Please allow me quote few examples without any bias.

Insurance - If  we decide to work in this field that it is marketing and networking job . We need to meet sale targets and new clients to keep going.

Driver - It is a good job to earn a living and keep ourselves active, but we may need to work out of town or drive for weeks away from home.

Construction jobs - These are physically demanding jobs, and we may have to work outside in all weather conditions.

Manufacturing or assembling - This is a shop environment  and inside job most of the time.

Television and media - This is a good job if a person of few years of practical experience.

What I believe, every human have some fixed number of years on this earth to live. This time is a precious commodity. Everything we get in this world is by trading our time.

One third of our life is spent at the work, further it may include one to two hours of travel time.

If we feel good at work that 10 hours a day is lived and enjoyed, and if we do not like our work this one third of our life gets wasted and just used to pay our bills, not lived, not enjoyed.

I strongly recommend you can do few survival jobs, but your aim should be always be to  follow your field of study, and the field you are expert of the subject.

I have done many survival jobs . I can mention a few, I worked as a security guard, packed plastic bottles at manufacturing plant at Leduc, worked as plumber helper, worked as an assembler at Sherwood Park through placement agency.

People will always tell you to change your aim but you must stick to your own analysis and observations.

You can always consult others and if you are convinced and your inner child agrees with it fine go with that. 

Remember one thing, You are only answerable to one person in this world , "The person in the Mirror"


Source – “Eckhart Tolle” “A New Earth Page 14-15-16”

What is the role of the established religions in the arising of the new consciousness? Many people are already aware of the difference between spirituality and religion. They realize that having a belief system a set of thoughts that you regard as the absolute truth – does not make you spiritual no matter what the nature of those beliefs is. In fact, the more you make your

thoughts (beliefs) into your identity, the more cut off you are from the spiritual dimension within yourself. Many “religious” people are stuck at that level. They equate truth with thought, and as they are completely identified with thought (their mind), they claim to be in sole possession of the truth in an unconscious attempt to protect their identity. They don’t

realize the limitations of thought. Unless you believe (think) exactly as they do, you are wrong in their eyes, and in the not too distant past, they would have felt justified in killing you for that. And some still do, even now.

The new spirituality, the transformation of consciousness, is arising to a large extent outside of the structures of the existing institutionalized religions. There were always pockets of spirituality even in mind-dominated religions, although the institutionalized hierarchies felt threatened by them

and often tried to suppress them. A largescale opening of spirituality outside of the religious structures is an entirely new development. In the past, this would have been inconceivable, especially in the West, the most mind-dominated of all cultures, where the Christian church had a virtual

franchise on spirituality. You couldn’t just stand up and give a spiritual talk or publish a spiritual book unless you were sanctioned by the church, and if you were not, they would quickly silence you. But now, even within certain

churches and religions, there are signs of change. It is heartwarming, and one is grateful for even the slightest signs of openness, such as Pope John Paul II visiting a mosque as well as a synagogue. Partly as a result of the spiritual teachings that have arisen outside the established religions, but also due to an influx of the ancient Eastern wisdom teachings, a growing number of followers of traditional religions are able to

let go of identification with form, dogma, and rigid belief systems and discover the original depth that is hidden within their own spiritual tradition at the same time as they discover the depth within themselves. They realize that how “spiritual” you are has nothing to do with what you believe but

everything to do with your state of consciousness. This, in turn, determines how you act in the world and interact with others.

Those unable to look beyond form become even more deeply entrenched in their beliefs, that is to say, in their mind. We are witnessing not only an unprecedented influx of consciousness at this time but also an entrenchment and intensification of the ego. Some religious institutions will be open to the new consciousness; others will harden their doctrinal positions and become part of all those other manmade structures through which the collective ego will defend itself and “fight back.” Some churches, sects, cults, or religious movements are basically collective egoic entities, as rigidly identified with their mental positions as the followers of any political ideology that is closed to any alternative interpretation of reality. But the ego is destined to dissolve, and all its ossified structures, whether they be religious or other institutions, corporations, or governments, will disintegrate from within, no matter how deeply entrenched they appear to be. The most rigid structures, the most impervious to change, will collapse first. This has already happened in the case of Soviet Communism. How deeply entrenched, how solid and monolithic it appeared, and yet within a few years, it disintegrated from within. No one foresaw this. All were taken by surprise. There are many more such surprises in store for us.


When faced with a radical crisis, when the old way of being in the world, of interacting with each other and with the realm of nature doesn’t work anymore, when survival is threatened by seemingly insurmountable problems, an individual lifeform

– or a species – will either die or become extinct or rise above the limitations of its condition through an evolutionary leap.

It is believed that the lifeforms on this planet first evolved in the sea. When there were no animals yet to be found on land, the sea was already teeming with life. Then at some point, one of the sea creatures must have started to venture onto dry land. It would perhaps crawl a few inches at first, then exhausted by the enormous gravitational pull of the planet, it would

return to the water, where gravity is almost nonexistent and where it could live with much greater ease. And then it tried again and again and again, and much later would adapt to life on land, grow feet instead of fins, develop lungs instead of gills. It seems unlikely that a species would venture into such an alien environment and undergo an evolutionary transformation

unless it was compelled to do so by some crisis situation. There may have been a large sea area that got cut off from the main ocean where the water gradually receded over thousands of years, forcing fish to leave their habitat and evolve.